![]() ![]() ![]() It's the viewer that I used to batch-output my photos. Imaging Edge is actually three programs (viewer, editor and camera remote control). So, as Michael C says, try the Sony program and see what happens. Some looked ok at the regular size, but when I zoomed in on the photo, there were a LOT of extra color and pixels that distracted from the image. It was VERY slow, taking about 24 hours to convert the photos (it's hard to tell exactly how long, because my laptop kept sleeping after a few hours, and I'm not sure the processing was working in the background.) Also, the resulting photos were very 'noisy'. FastStone has some other options that could be tweaked that might make more of a difference, but I didn't play with them.įotor was not very good. The jpeg file sizes were much larger, around double the size. The quality was nearly indistinguishable. It was as fast, or nearly as fast, as Imaging Edge. I used the "Quality = 100" setting, everything else default. It's also reasonably fast, 500 pictures took around 30-40 minutes.įastStone Viewer was nearly as good. It's made by Sony and going by the logic that "Sony knows Sony", I trust that it knows how to work with it's own camera's images. I've tried a small handful of programs so far- Imaging Edge, Fotor, FastStone Image Viewer. I recently found myself in the same situation, took some RAW shots, not RAW + Jpeg, and now have a ton of photos that I need to improve in order to show anyone.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |